Comparison of preload versus coload by crystalloid in parturients undergoing caesarean section under spinal anaesthesia: an analytical study
نویسندگان
چکیده
Background: Spinal anesthesia is popular, simple and well accepted reliable technique for below umbilicus surgery. It frequently used lower segment section because of its rapid onset, a dense neural block, avoidance risk airway, little local anesthetic toxicity minimal transfer drug to the fetus, as failure block. Objectives this study was compare incidence severity hypotension, dose requirement mephentermine maternal bradycardia, shivering, nausea, vomiting. Methods: ASA grade I, II parturients posted elective cesarean were randomly allocated in two groups 55 each receive either preload or co-load with Ringers lactate solution, blood pressure, heart rate, other outcomes recorded at regular interval. Results: Hypotension observed significantly less co-loading group (37.18%) than preloading (61.81%). Mean vasopressor also more group. Heart rate change, vomiting fetal outcome remained same across both groups. Conclusions: Co-loading crystalloids effective strategy prevention spinal induced hypotension. We can save valuable time given case emergency caesarean sections.
منابع مشابه
Comparison of Neonatal Apgar Score & Umbilical Artery Blood Gas Parameters Among parturients Undergoing Elective Caesarean Section Under Spinal, Epidural & General Anaesthesia: A Prospective Randomized Observational Study
Lower segment caesarean section (LSCS) is a life-saving procedure for the parturient and her baby. The frequency of caesarean section continues to rise steadily worldwide [1]. Today, caesarean delivery accounts for more than 30% of all births [2]. In India the incidence of LSCS is increased from 3% to10% between 1992-93 and 2005-06 [3]. Anaesthesia to a parturient affects both mother and fetus,...
متن کاملRandomized controlled study of colloid preload before spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section.
We randomized women having elective Caesarean section to receive either no preload (control group, n=33) or 4% gelatin solution (Gelofusine) 15 ml kg(-1) (colloid group, n=35) i.v. before spinal anaesthesia. Intravenous metaraminol was titrated at 0.25-0.75 mg min(-1) to maintain systolic arterial pressure (SAP) in the target range 90-100% of baseline after the spinal injection. The control gro...
متن کاملPeripartum cardiomyopathy undergoing caesarean section under epidural anaesthesia.
PURPOSE To report a case of peripartum dilated cardiomyopathy presenting for emergency caesarean section, this was successfully managed with Epidural Anaesthesia. CLINICAL FEATURES A parturient suffering from idiopathic peripartum cardiomyopathy (E.F. 18%) was brought for an emergency caesarean section. Epidural anaesthesia was performed and 2% Lignocaine with adrenaline total 13 ml was injec...
متن کاملAnaesthetic Challenges in a High Risk Parturient with Myasthenia Gravis Undergoing Caesarean Section under Spinal Anaesthesia.
The prevalence of myasthenia gravis is low. The management implications of this disease in pregnant women are very challenging for anaesthetists. The objective is to highlight some of the challenges, the management and the lessons learnt during the management of this patient. This is a case report of a 31-year old parturient with diagnosed myasthenia gravis co-existing with hepatitis B infectio...
متن کاملSupplemental oxygen for caesarean section under spinal anaesthesia.
BACKGROUND Routine administration of supplemental oxygen to parturients undergoing Caesarean section under spinal anaesthesia has been criticised in recent times. OBJECTIVES To assess the need for routine supplementary oxygen in healthy women undergoing Caesarean section under spinal anaesthesia in resource challenged setting and establish the efficacy of administration of oxygen at 4L/min. ...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: International Journal of Research in Medical Sciences
سال: 2023
ISSN: ['2320-6012', '2320-6071']
DOI: https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-6012.ijrms20232084